IJAHSS employs a single-blind peer-review system, whereby the identities of reviewers remain confidential while author information is available to reviewers.
All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial screening to assess:
Manuscripts that successfully pass the initial screening are assigned to at least two independent expert reviewers in the relevant field. Where necessary, additional reviewers may be invited to ensure a comprehensive and balanced evaluation.
Reviewers assess manuscripts based on:
Based on reviewer recommendations, the Editorial Team may issue one of the following decisions:
The final publication decision rests solely with the Editor-in-Chief or designated Academic Editor.
All article categories, including research articles, review articles, case studies, short communications, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence, are subject to peer review and editorial evaluation.
IJAHSS follows internationally recognized authorship principles consistent with the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
To qualify as an author, an individual must have made substantial contributions to all of the following:
Individuals who contributed to the research but do not meet the authorship criteria should be acknowledged appropriately in the Acknowledgements section.
The corresponding author is responsible for:
Authors are encouraged to provide their ORCID iD during submission to ensure accurate researcher identification.
To preserve transparency and objectivity, all authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
Authors must disclose:
All current academic, governmental, corporate, professional, or organizational affiliations relevant to the research.
Authors must identify all funding sources supporting the research, including:
Authors must declare any financial, professional, personal, or intellectual interests that could influence the research or its interpretation.
Examples include:
If no conflicts exist, authors should clearly state:
"The authors declare no competing interests."
Reviewers and editors must disclose any conflicts that may affect their objectivity and should decline involvement when impartial evaluation cannot be guaranteed.
IJAHSS considers manuscripts only if they:
The journal accepts submissions derived from:
Authors must disclose any previous public dissemination of the work.
Duplicate publication, redundant publication, and plagiarism constitute serious ethical violations and may result in immediate rejection.
IJAHSS supports responsible scholarly communication and permits the submission of manuscripts previously posted on recognized preprint platforms.
Authors should disclose:
Presentation of research findings at academic conferences does not preclude submission to the journal.
Any prior conference presentation should be acknowledged in the manuscript.
Authors must provide sufficient methodological and analytical detail to enable evaluation and replication of the study.
Where applicable, manuscripts should include:
The Editorial Office may seek independent statistical review when necessary.
Authors must ensure that all figures, images, illustrations, and graphical materials accurately represent the original data.
The following practices are prohibited:
The journal reserves the right to request original image files and supporting data for verification purposes.
Authors are encouraged to follow internationally recognized reporting standards appropriate to their study design.
Examples include:
Adherence to reporting guidelines improves transparency, reproducibility, and research quality.
Research involving human participants, animals, or sensitive data must comply with applicable ethical standards.
Authors must:
Authors must provide information regarding:
IJAHSS supports the principles of open science and encourages responsible data sharing.
Authors are encouraged to:
Data sharing enhances transparency, reproducibility, and research impact.
The journal is committed to maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record.
Where minor errors are identified after publication, corrections may be issued to clarify the published record without affecting the scientific conclusions.
An Editorial Expression of Concern may be published when serious questions arise regarding the reliability, ethics, or integrity of a published article while an investigation is ongoing.
Articles may be retracted in cases involving:
Retraction procedures follow the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).